A compendium of links mostly relating to science and science library issues.
Friday, September 26, 2003
Posted
1:19 PM
by Garrett
Actionbioscience.orgInteresting ... A highly touted site (lauded by Scientific American) that seeks to educate students and the public on issues in bioscience, including discoveries in evolution, genetics, biodiversity and biotechnology, among other themes. Each section has an extensive list of articles explore a variety of topical questions ("How do antibiotics affect bacteria" "What is nanotechnology") and provide links to further reading. Well-researched and thoughtful. (Source: Neat New Stuff on the Net)
Posted
11:47 AM
by Garrett
PSIgate - Science TimelinesPart of PSIGate(Physical Sciences Information Gateway,) this site features timelines in various disciplines (physics, earth sciences, chemistry, materials sciences - or you can browse all at once), listing significant scientific events in chronological order. From each entry, links to related web sites are featured, resources indexed and annotated extensively by PSIGate. Keyword searching is available. (Sources: BlackStump; ResourceShelf)
Posted
11:25 AM
by Garrett
The Wilbur and Orville Wright PapersThe Library of Congress announced the latest site in its American Memory Project, observing the centennial of the Wright Brothers' flight at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Material includes letters, drawings, photographs and the brothers' glass-plated phtographic negatives. (Source: The ResourceShelf)
Posted
10:50 AM
by Garrett
going Google beyond Another good discussion of how to use more than what search engine, and what others offer that Google does not. alltheweb,altavista, teoma and vivismo are examples. (Source: The Virtual Chase)
Posted
10:36 AM
by Garrett
History shows hurricanes are not rising A New Scientist article reports on research that contradicts the belief that hurricanes are becoming more prevalent due to climate change and other factors.
Posted
10:34 AM
by Garrett
Do we need more scientists? An article in the Public Interest says make careers in science more attractive rather than worrying about speculated personnel shortages. (Source: Chronicle of Higher Education Daily Update)
Posted
4:43 PM
by Garrett
Open-access row leads paper to shed authors Nature reports that the New England Journal of Medicine and Stanford University researchers have been trading barbs over a paper recently published by the journal. Stanford's Pat Brown is one of the founders of the Public Library of Science; when one of his grad students wanted to publish their results in NEJM, Brown tried to get the journal to accept open-access considerations. NEJM refused. Subsequently, the student resubmitted the paper, with Brown and three others no longer listed as authors but acknowledged as contributors. It was accepted and published this past summer. A cartoon in the news story shows a medical researcher caught between the "rock" of traditional journals such as NEJM and the "hard place" of open access publishing. Is this a false choice?